So much of today’s hip-hop music, and that of recent years has glorified the use of women as objects needing to be controlled. It’s not my place, or anyone else’s to categorize her as a “groupie ho” and her sex life is in no way justification for abuse. So what about Kat Stacks makes her a “groupie ho.” I am in no way agreeing with Kat Stacks lifestyle choices, they would not be my own, but it’s her life, and she can live it as she pleases. Likewise, when Jay-Z proudly proclaimed “ I thug ’em, fuck ’em, love ’em, leave ’em” he was “Big Pimpin,” not trickin. I suppose that would make him a “player,” which is something to be admired. No one labeled Ludacris a ho despite his “having hoes in different area codes.” I love hip-hop music, always have, and hopefully always will but if we’re going to hand out titles and labels let’s ignore the double-standards and pass them out equally. What I do know is that she isn’t doing anything men haven’t been doing for years yet she’s classified as a groupie, ho, trick, deserving of abuse.

My question is, why is the fact that no one should have placed their hands on her prefaced by her being a “groupie ho?” Also, what about how she lives her life makes her a “groupie ho?” I have not been following the Kat Stacks wave so I have no clue who she may or may not have slept with or what she may have said about them.

In searching the internet for the video I have seen many titles such as “Groupie HO Gets Attacked,” or “Groupie Kat Stacks Get Slapped Out Of Chair.”Įven the public’s comments after watching the video have implied that as a “groupie ho” she probably deserved it but they should not have hit her, at least on camera. The last few days have seen the online hip-hop community in an outrage over a video showing Kat Stacks being slapped and assaulted by some men.

Groupie katt stacks